Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:39:12 -0800 (PST) From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: office@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fw: ports/164230: repocopy request: editors/openoffice.org-3-devel to editors/apache-openoffice-3-devel Message-ID: <1326814752.93513.YahooMailClassic@web113509.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20120117092409.GH4729@azathoth.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Baptiste!=0A=0A--- Mar 17/1/12, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> ha= scritto:=0A=0A> > FWIW,=0A> > =0A> > --- Lun 16/1/12, Eitan Adler <lists@e= itanadler.com>=0A> ha scritto:=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > > > Hi=0A> > > >=0A> > >= > I have just raised a pr.=0A> > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.c= gi?pr=3D164230=0A> > > =0A> > > I'd object for the same reason we have=0A> = www/firefox not=0A> > > www/mozilla-firefox=0A> > > =0A> > > People expect = to find OO.o is specific places.=0A> > > =0A> > =0A> > I see .. we can keep= it as openoffice.org for now=0A> > To make it easier to find but when the = first Apache=0A> > release is made we should rename it because the new=0A> = > trademark owner renamed it to Apache OpenOffice=0A> > and the word Apache= is part of the brand.=0A> > =0A> > Pedro.=0A> =0A> In my concern there is = no problem in renaming it at all as=0A> soon as a MOVED entry is added, OO.= o is dead and now it=0A> is AOO, respecting the naming is good imho.=0A> = =0AHas netcraft confirmed it? ;-).=0A=0AFWIW, we are in no shortage of requ= ests to use the=0AOpenOffice.org brand so I suspect we will keep using=0Abo= th names for a while.=0A=0A> This case is not the same as Mozilla Firefox b= ecause this=0A> is Firefox (software from Mozilla), in our concern this=0A>= Apache OpenOffice (software from Apache) (Pedro,=0A> Maho do you confirm ?= ), in that case renaming is fine imho,=0A> otherwise the rename should go t= o openoffice-3-devel.=0A> =0A=0AAdding the Apache name to the brand is the = standard Apache=0Apolicy and in the ports tree we already have more that=0A= 50 ports for apache projects using the "Apache" name.=0A=0AI personally pre= fer shorter names (I am lazy typing paths)=0Aand PKGNAMEPREFIX=3D apache- i= s sufficient to solve the=0AApache naming requirement but this port is clea= rly Maho's=0Aprerogative and if he says the name is apache-openoffice,=0Ath= en so be it.=0A=0APedro.=0A
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1326814752.93513.YahooMailClassic>