Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:00:56 -0600 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Daniel Holmes <danielh@zorkmid.dakcs.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: acpi_cpu printf Message-ID: <20030121230056.GB80481@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <3E2DCD8B.91E441A2@mindspring.com> References: <200301211554.h0LFsKmX002682@zorkmid.dakcs.com> <3E2DCD8B.91E441A2@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Jan 21), Terry Lambert said: > I think that changing the order from "100% to 10%" to "10% to 100%" > will, if people ignore the second printed line, imply that there was > a transition from 10% to 100%, rather than the reverse (that was my > response to the patch). Or better yet, "10%-100%" to imply a range instead of a transition, since the message is printing your options, not the fact that the CPU speed is actually changing now. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030121230056.GB80481>