Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 01:57:13 -0600 From: David Syphers <dsyphers@uchicago.edu> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: firewall_enable Message-ID: <200202020757.g127vDg12497@midway.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <20020201.225650.39719656.imp@village.org> References: <20020202005621.841F4406A@i8k.babbleon.org> <20020202033112.5490F406A@i8k.babbleon.org> <20020201.225650.39719656.imp@village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 01 February 2002 11:56 pm, M. Warner Losh wrote: > Actually, there's a simple way around this that is failsafe. > > firewall_enable=YES What it deos now > =NO Wide open > =FAILSAFE Defaults to wired down. Before the discussion on -stable degenerated, there were several calls for making this variable tri-state. It definitely seems like the best solution. Now that this is on -current and we have something concrete, maybe it can get committed :) -David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200202020757.g127vDg12497>