Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:39:55 -0800
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Default inode number too low in FFS nowadays?
Message-ID:  <4EB71ACB.6060100@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAF-QHFVJa=WvNFEFtk5GYQ3T86FDkpnOC%2BiaK8R%2B3CwFJvrgYQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <B888842A-7DB4-491B-93E3-A376745019F5@sarenet.es> <j8u2af$chv$1@dough.gmane.org> <5C156A63-D86D-4C1B-AFC4-DC5EA09494F6@xerq.net> <4EB3C63F.2060805@quip.cz> <20111104141626.GA28925@freebsd.org> <4EB7126C.3030809@FreeBSD.org> <CAF-QHFVJa=WvNFEFtk5GYQ3T86FDkpnOC%2BiaK8R%2B3CwFJvrgYQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/06/2011 14:36, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 7 November 2011 00:04, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
>> This comes up periodically, and for some reason no one pays attention to
>> all the work that's been done in the past to verify that the fastest
>> method is:
>>
>> find /usr/ports -maxdepth 3 -type d -name work -exec rm -rf {} \;
> 
> So... time to add it to fortune/datfiles/freebsd-tips ?

Sure, go ahead. :)  Of course please be sure to include the bit about
WRKDIRPREFIX being the preferred solution.


Doug

-- 

		"We could put the whole Internet into a book."
		"Too practical."

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EB71ACB.6060100>