Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:38:27 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Lupe Christoph <lupe@lupe-christoph.de>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Challenge during the ports freeze Message-ID: <20050805173827.GA39182@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050805164846.GA58754@isis.sigpipe.cz> References: <20050804211547.GA678@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050805060115.GA20697@lupe-christoph.de> <20050805152311.GB4282@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050805164846.GA58754@isis.sigpipe.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 06:48:47PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # kris@obsecurity.org / 2005-08-05 11:23:11 -0400: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 08:01:15AM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote: > > > Munin behaves this way in all other platform ports. Changing this > > > behaviour would make the FreeBSD the sore thumb of the Munin ports ;-) > >=20 > > I remember these previous discussions and accept that it would take > > some work to make munin-node ports-conformant, but unfortunately, it's > > not easy to exclude this port from the standard package checks (no > > other packages need that), which means it will have to stay listed as > > a "broken" port for now because of these extra files. >=20 > How about IGNORing it forever? Yeah, it could be marked IGNORE in the PACKAGE_BUILDING case to hide it from the error list. Kris --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC86QSWry0BWjoQKURAhicAKDSErtpFgSbDHQckIrEJd5ZHYDzhQCg5SW9 eYctiwtaNQPTmRYAusf9FpE= =qn75 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050805173827.GA39182>