Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 14:15:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Leif Neland <leifn@internet.dk> To: CyberPeasant <djv@bedford.net> Cc: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cron Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980510141310.570A-100000@darla.swimsuit.internet.dk> In-Reply-To: <199805100603.CAA13113@castor.loco.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Yes. You should never change root's shell, no matter how tempting. > > eh? Naw, we're not married to csh, are we? > > > I have changed the roots shell to /usr/local/bin/bash. > > When I boot in single mode, I get the the question "enter name of shell or > > <return> for /bin/sh" (or equivalent). I then press return, and get > > /bin/sh. > > > > No problem, or am I missing anything? > > > No problem, normal operation. Recall that at this point, /usr is > (probably -- definitely, if on a separate partition), not mounted. > I agree. I can live with /bin/sh in single-user mode; I'll probably not much which _require_ filename completion and history. So what is the big problem with having /usr/local/bin/bash as root's shell in multiuser, and /bin/sh in singleuser? Leif Neland leifn@internet.dk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980510141310.570A-100000>