Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:03:00 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@deepcore.dk>, Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata atapi-cd.c atapi-cd.h Message-ID: <473DDB54.6050007@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <29732.1195235967@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <29732.1195235967@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <473DD94D.8050605@samsco.org>, Scott Long writes: > >>> The simplest way to do this, is probably to overload ENOENT or some >>> other currently undefined errno for this effect. >> But then why not have g_access be able to communicate the ability to >> access the device independent from the ability to access the media? >> Seems like both of these questions are "access" questions. > > Because that is a lot more work for no benefit I can see ? > Says the man who complains to others about doing things the Right Way and not adding hacks =-) Oh well. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?473DDB54.6050007>