Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 09:35:20 -0700 From: "Michael O'Henly" <michael@327.ca> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Subject: Re: how much ram/cpu/swap to run emacs/xemacs effectively? Message-ID: <01052109352001.02633@h24-69-46-74.gv.shawcable.net> In-Reply-To: <15113.14294.938464.793514@guru.mired.org> References: <87062509@toto.iv> <20010521152416.A80077@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <15113.14294.938464.793514@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
jed is another excellent alternative. Has console and X flavours, many excellent modes, is light and fast, etc. For years, I used jed as an email editor since it started up so quickly. M. On Monday 21 May 2001 08:44, Mike Meyer wrote: > For those wanting a small alternative to GNU Emacs, mg just hit the > ports tree. It was specifically designed so that all the habits I had > from GNU emacs worked properly. -- Michael O'Henly To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01052109352001.02633>