Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:23:50 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: new target to display options Message-ID: <20030418212350.GA98683@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030418163309.GA64856@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> References: <20030418101304.GF20941@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20030418160126.GA97618@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030418163309.GA64856@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 06:33:09PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # kris@obsecurity.org / 2003-04-18 09:01:26 -0700: > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 12:13:04PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > Hi there, > > >=20 > > > various ports display messages informing the user that they can use > > > WITH_THIS or WITHOUT_THAT. these messages are put into pre-everything, > > > pre-fetch, post-fetch... How about a new target, say, "options"? > >=20 > > See my dialog-based config patches I posted a while back. When I can > > find the time I need to make some minor changes and commit them. >=20 > I've read the thread on MARC, but didn't study the code. Will it > force me to configure ports through dialogs? I *really* hope that's > not the case. No. Kris --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+oGzmWry0BWjoQKURAhh0AKDIYD4YwUnIl3Ipqhw9SweSRxr+qwCfev/t nTtZxzaOmF7fWrMBZ5RnQcs= =NK0G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030418212350.GA98683>