Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 16:43:51 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Procmail got updated! Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712211639540.25323@aneurin.horsfall.org> In-Reply-To: <B51F1354-44C9-4936-A78B-84F34A4516B5@adamw.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712181012470.92288@aneurin.horsfall.org> <a3a1097d-22c7-89cc-dd69-b4ceeebf7228@gmx.de> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1712181824220.10261@io-tx.com> <f68594db-396b-0821-e90d-3f089781e8fd@gmx.de> <5A39F7C9.1030800@grosbein.net> <05504d3c-3225-e83f-8f10-225319421a35@gmx.de> <B51F1354-44C9-4936-A78B-84F34A4516B5@adamw.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017, Adam Weinberger wrote: > I'm a little unsettled by this discussion, because it is moving into > territory with which we have very little precedent. And the precedent > that it would establish is not wholly within our mandate. Am I the only one who remembers the kerfuffle over "jive" being de-ported (to coin a phrase)? No technical reason whatsoever, but apparently it upset someone's delicate sensibilities, so there's sort of a precedent. -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.21.1712211639540.25323>