Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:02:40 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> Cc: "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer Message-ID: <CAPyFy2BaoF-7t-skTUPt97hkRgdjO-KbB2-vhjOus-nutNO5Fw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201304152012.r3FKCdI3085567@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <glebius@FreeBSD.org> <20130415195544.GY76816@FreeBSD.org> <201304152012.r3FKCdI3085567@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 April 2013 16:12, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> wrote: > The existing license isn't that BSD-friendly either, which is why it lives > in contrib/. I think the 5.1.X GPLv2 is about the same friendliness as > Darren's IPF 4.1.X license. As long as it's not in GENERIC should be fine. > A person can always load it anyway. There's a plan[1] to remove the remaining GPL components from base over time. Updating to the last ipfilter that's under the current license is probably the path forward, unless it moves out to ports. [1] https://wiki.freebsd.org/GPLinBase -Ed
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2BaoF-7t-skTUPt97hkRgdjO-KbB2-vhjOus-nutNO5Fw>