Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:24:16 +0000 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Wesley Shields <wxs@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, tabthorpe@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports MOVED ports/security Makefile ports/security/isolate Makefile distinfo pkg-descr Message-ID: <AANLkTi=sFMBWPCc3TSW8YO8mKJGrEAfh6fXLu6U0Z62Z@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100817131333.GB86627@atarininja.org> References: <201008171304.o7HD4Qni030189@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100817131333.GB86627@atarininja.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/8/17 Wesley Shields <wxs@freebsd.org>: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:04:26PM +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> bapt =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02010-08-17 13:04:26 UTC >> >> =A0 FreeBSD ports repository >> >> =A0 Modified files: >> =A0 =A0 . =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0MOVED >> =A0 =A0 security =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Makefile >> =A0 Removed files: >> =A0 =A0 security/isolate =A0 =A0 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr >> =A0 Log: >> =A0 Security vulnerability: local root privileges escalation problems > > Wow, this seems a little excessive to me. Why was this removed? Is > upstream not going to fix the problem(s)? Isn't marking it broken and a > vuxml entry enough while we give them time to address the problems? > > -- WXS > Sorry my log wasn't descriptive enough. Upstream asked me to remove the por= ts, so did the maintainer. Also upstream removed the google code page for the project and currently do= esn't plan a fix. I'll try to make better commit log next time. regards, Bapt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=sFMBWPCc3TSW8YO8mKJGrEAfh6fXLu6U0Z62Z>