Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 14:46:22 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 156226] [lagg]: failover does not announce the failover to switch Message-ID: <bug-156226-2472-vosE6j8fc1@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-156226-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-156226-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156226 --- Comment #18 from eugen@grosbein.net --- (In reply to weberge42 from comment #17) > If failover using lagg with different switches is not supported or is considered exotic, the feature should be removed. The docs do not mention that this is the case. lagg failover works just fine at present using links connected to the switch(es) with single FIB (just one switch or stack of switches) and should not be removed. I agree that documentation may need some warnings against not supported configurations but it cannot foretell all kinds of network setups built on wrong assumptions. OTOH, it can give a hint towards other known ways to build failure-resistant setups like RSTP etc. Some short hint, because man page is not textbook. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-156226-2472-vosE6j8fc1>