Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 14:05:52 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fallout from the CVS discussion Message-ID: <90B6D589-3A2C-42E6-9017-C9D90A3EA8A5@kientzle.com> In-Reply-To: <68E67617-A497-48FB-9B63-1AAC06BD60DA@gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxg=qVUHe7tc9_AXgRdUtkoHOrixwNw-GsN7C7_r0FR990A@mail.gmail.com> <20120916053523.GJ37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <CAF6rxg=mm9OeVDX-dYC=FwnAZ-6pGjcRad=Gm9-mLx3QiPtqVQ@mail.gmail.com> <51B48339-D1FA-49CD-B582-1C58855B024E@bsdimp.com> <CAJ-Vmo=BBgP4_eVXw7LxiFsdj2wSpAMGy4gzZybb=EiHqPFYXg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgn3Tmt=YRjsrK0eCb9b0wPw=uH8nKTs2Th8ZjS9zO84%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> <68E67617-A497-48FB-9B63-1AAC06BD60DA@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 16, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > 2. Subversion sometimes breaks between major/minor versions (1.6->1.7 = comes to mind) and is not backwards compatible in many cases (again, 1.6 = -> 1.7 transition). Yep. The working-copy compatibility issue is a pretty serious obstacle to including SVN in base. I generally like SVN a lot, but the WC format changes are real headaches when you have a bunch of tools that use different SVN libraries.=20 Tim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?90B6D589-3A2C-42E6-9017-C9D90A3EA8A5>