Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 02:45:50 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 Message-ID: <20030702234550.GF48919@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20030702214050.GA38335@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <200307011257.h61Cvr0j074180@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030701171328.GA6789@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030702071850.GA58755@sunbay.com> <20030702081951.GA19646@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030702093910.GA74796@sunbay.com> <20030702185229.GA22122@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030702203234.GB43809@sunbay.com> <20030702214050.GA38335@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--vtJ+CqYNzKB4ukR4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:40:50PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:32:34PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:52:29AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 12:39:10PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > if incompatible from the target. The compiler is now built > > > > > second and I'm expecting that all tools built after it will > > > > > not run. Unless something changed since the last time I looked. > > > > >=20 > > > > The cross-compiler is installed into WORLDTMP which is part of > > > > XPATH. XPATH only appears in PATH for WMAKEENV and IMAKEENV. > > >=20 > > > Ok. I guess we dont need the cross-binutils in WORDTMP when we > > > build the cross-compiler. That was one of the original requirements. > > >=20 > > No we don't, we can't use it, it may be for a different arch. >=20 > Technically we can, provided we need to operate on the object files > for the target architecture. For example: if gcc needs to construct > libgcc2, which IIRC is the support library for use on the target, > it needs the cross-assembler provided by binutils. >=20 > It doesn't realy matter. If we currently don't need the cross tools > provided by binutils, we're ok. That's the point. >=20 > > Hmm, at least groff and config(8) use yacc(1) for building, > > and groff now comes before yacc. > >=20 > > I will re-test building of 5.x on 4.0-RELEASE to see if this > > change broke this, and report here. >=20 > Ok. I think yacc(1) is in the list for 3.x compatibility (yes, > the stuff is that old :-) Again, we may be ok now because we don't > try to upgrade from pre-4 installations, but that only means that > the ordering bugs go unnoticed. >=20 I've browsed the commit logs for yacc, and it's likely that it needs to be before groff and config(8). If it is so, I will document the dependency. > An interesting test may be to clear the list of bootstrap-tools and > try to build world on 4.0. Add tools to fix build problems and > compare the resulting list with the one we have now. We may be able > to nuke some programs... >=20 No, I don't believe we can shrink the current list. Look at how the stuff was conditionalized recently, based on OSRELDATE. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software Ltd, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --vtJ+CqYNzKB4ukR4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/A26uUkv4P6juNwoRAoHvAJ9jvjtogXo8XR2zwCiPD9LppJlJDgCfYorS AhBs9otYsJDYHsqwZLDvo0Y= =l8wT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vtJ+CqYNzKB4ukR4--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030702234550.GF48919>