Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 01:22:37 -0400 From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/news/diablo Makefile ports/news/diablo/files md5 post-install-notes ports/news/diablo/patches patch-aa ports/news/diablo/pkg INSTALL MESSAGE COMMENT DESCR PLIST ports/news/diablo/scripts diablo.sh createuser Message-ID: <20000629012237.G13914@argon.gryphonsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20000628220905.E31775@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 10:09:05PM -0700 References: <200006261229.FAA47475@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000626083836.X85886@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <xzplmzrz9uv.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20000628220905.E31775@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ moving to -ports ] On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 10:09:05PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > It has no point. (other than the $FreeBSD$) So maybe we ought to abolish the ports' headers completely, as NetBSD has done some time ago? What does everyone else think? This would not be a functional change; it only requires a small script to go through the entire tree and rip out the comment headers except for # $FreeBSD$ .. which I think is the only thing necessary. -- Will Andrews <andrewsw@purdue.edu> <will@FreeBSD.org> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000629012237.G13914>