Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:02:59 -0500 From: Eric Anderson <anderson@freebsd.org> To: Roman Kurakin <rik@inse.ru> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEDSUP: man -k cleanup (man -k RAID, some bits are missing) Message-ID: <464A03E3.4040805@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4649E0AD.4060705@inse.ru> References: <4649E0AD.4060705@inse.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/15/07 11:32, Roman Kurakin wrote: > Hi all, > > Trying to obtain information about supported RAID devices in > the system via `man -k RAID` I've found that not all known > by me devices are there. So a grep-ed a bit and going to commit > the following patchset. I think that keyword RAID should present > in description of all these man pages. But may be I am wrong? > > There is also some bits I was not able to fix. > 1) Is it safe to s/Array/RAID/ in ida(4)? I don't think that's good - an array isn't necessarily a RAID, and a s/r of that name yields bad results. > 2) Is it safe to mark ciss as driver for RAID controllers? > 3) Should be isp(4) marked as driver for RAID controllers? But isp isn't a RAID controller, it's an HBA. > 4) Should geom(4) be patched as suggested in my patch or > it is enough of mentioning in corresponding class utilities? > 5) Have I missed smth else? > > PS. I think that there is other such places where `man -k` is not > complete, so its good todo idea, currently not for me ;-). > PPS. Sorry for crossposting. I hope I included all affected parties. Eric
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?464A03E3.4040805>