Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 03:28:51 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> To: Bill Coffman <bill.coffman@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Dupre <ale@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: port versions Message-ID: <20050119032851.5d402a3e@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <6f9c15f805011817175e3e821@mail.gmail.com> References: <6f9c15f8050118105132e37e02@mail.gmail.com> <41ED88C0.1090805@FreeBSD.org> <6f9c15f805011817175e3e821@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Plese don't top post On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:17:46 -0800 Bill Coffman <bill.coffman@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the info. > > Since we're on the subject, I was wondering about other conventions > for port versions. Sometimes it's "_1" or "_2" and sometimes it's > like "p5-DBD-mysql40-2.9004_1". Is there any reason for all these, or > are they just left to the variable discretion of the port maintainer? No. Reason: /usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050119032851.5d402a3e>