Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:28:26 -0400
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
Cc:        Ngie Cooper <ngie@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r320222 - in stable/10: etc etc/cron.d etc/mtree etc/newsyslog.conf.d etc/pam.d etc/syslog.d tools/build/mk usr.sbin/cron/cron usr.sbin/cron/lib usr.sbin/syslogd
Message-ID:  <f9d18800-4813-fccd-4955-17c71deafe8a@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <223428BC-9035-4435-B8EB-9A72EDCDD225@gmail.com>
References:  <201706220708.v5M78IYv080609@repo.freebsd.org> <bd506dd1-4f0c-820b-cf31-b41416f7e9b1@FreeBSD.org> <223428BC-9035-4435-B8EB-9A72EDCDD225@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/22/17 4:02 AM, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote:
> 
>> On Jun 22, 2017, at 00:35, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> …
> 
>> Please revert the breakout of the existing config files.  I think that splitting
>> up the conf files is too disruptive of a change (POLA) for stable branches.
> 
> 	Done in r320229 and r320230.

I haven't checked if this was merged to 11, but if so, I think they should also
stay a single conf file in 11 for the same reason.

>> This was agreed to by other folks in the followup thread to the commits in
>> head that you continue to ignore.
> 
> 
>> In head please either fully split up the files or revert to a single file
>> (another part of that thread you continue to ignore).
> 
> 	My eyes glazed over trying to read through all of the posts. I seem to have missed the point where a proposed change was made to split up the config files further. Could this please be summarized again?

I think that having the files partially split up is the worst of both
worlds as folks writing config management rules, etc. have to use
different approaches depending on the rule.  I think that is a headache
and would rather have the config either be all in a single file, or all
be split up into conf.d/ so that it is consistent.  I also think that
when splitting up a conf file we should do it all at once so that there is
only one painful /etc merge instead of several of them.

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f9d18800-4813-fccd-4955-17c71deafe8a>