Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:22:55 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/119463: [handbook] [patch] typo in printing/chapter.sgml Message-ID: <20080115022255.GB41162@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20080114184239.K1094@wonkity.com> References: <200801141342.m0EDgjCB069055@freefall.freebsd.org> <1200344044.478bcbecb1228@imp.free.fr> <20080114155723.K26271@wonkity.com> <1031589748.20080115014830@rulez.sk> <20080114184239.K1094@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2008-01-14 18:48, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Daniel Gerzo wrote: >> Tuesday, January 15, 2008, 12:02:32 AM, Warren Block wrote: >>> <para>You should also include the <literal>rw</literal> capability >>> so <application>LPD</application> opens the printer in read-write >>> mode. >> >> Maybe something like: >> >> <para>The <literal>rw</literal> capability should be also included in >> order to let <application>LPD</application> to open the printer in >> the read-write mode.</para> > > That's a little passive, although I agree with removing "you should". > Let's make it imperative: > > <para>Include the <literal>rw</literal> capability so > <application>LPD</application> will open the printer in read-write > mode. That sounds cool. Can I commit this version? I think we have spent enough time tinkering with a little sentence already. It would be far more productive if we wrote even _more_ documentation :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080115022255.GB41162>