Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:04:26 +0100
From:      "Stuart Walsh" <stu@ipng.org.uk>
To:        "Alexander Leidinger" <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        ticso@cicely.de
Subject:   Re: Atmel AT76C503 USB 802.11b device driver
Message-ID:  <003f01c38dd7$600ac730$0202a8c0@icecold>
References:  <20031007133656.GA860@icecold.stu><20031008025940.GA21407@deepfreeze.stu><20031008152729.GF13791@cicely12.cicely.de><20031008154934.GA41872@deepfreeze.stu> <20031008175413.0011d462.Alexander@Leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 16:49:34 +0100
> Stuart Walsh <stu@ipng.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > They were, yes.  But once when the sendmail daemon wasn't running.  I
> > checked the mail queue before i sent it again and it wasn't there.
> > Perhaps sendmail stores failed mail somewhere I'm not familiar with.
> > EUSERERROR would seem to apply..
>
> "mailq" or "mailq -Ac"?
>

I think we've established I was at fault, but thanks :)  It really was just
an off the cuff remark, I didn't intend to start an MTA war or a sendmail
usage lecture.

Can we restrict all further posts in this thread to feedback on my driver?
:)

Regards,

Stuart




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?003f01c38dd7$600ac730$0202a8c0>