Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:18:51 -0600
From:      Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org>, Mike Durian <durian@shadetreesoftware.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: www/libwww and SSL
Message-ID:  <BA851D8D1FC943B3631B9406@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local>
In-Reply-To: <45975BFB.2050604@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200612291040.29615.durian@shadetreesoftware.com> <20061229190954.GA84882@icarus.home.lan> <1A211FD8C37E9E9379B4526E@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> <20061229212658.GA87752@icarus.home.lan> <54DC7293385544FE17F45902@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> <45975BFB.2050604@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==========79A687210F556ED789C3==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

--On December 30, 2006 10:43:07 PM -0800 Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>=20
wrote:

> Paul Schmehl wrote:
>
>> What I want isn't really relevant.  I'm simply suggesting that updating
>> the port to include an OPTION for with_ssl seems unnecessary *unless*
>> someone is going to port sipX.  Have you looked at sipX?  Porting it
>> would not be simple, and I wonder how much demand there would be.  In
>> any case, *unless* sipX gets ported, it doesn't make sense to me to
>> update www/libwww simply to enable an option no one has asked for until
>> now.
>
> OTOH, what harm does it cause?
>
That depends on how the port is patched.  If with_ssl is included in every =

build, it's hard to say.  There may be many unintended consequences.  If=20
with_ssl is included as an OPTION, then when the port is built it will=20
require someone to be at the console (or an entry in /etc/make.conf.)

In either case it's a change, and changes should be thought through and=20
tested carefully, *especially* when they're being done to solve one=20
discrete problem rather than adding general functionality that is required =

for many things.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

--==========79A687210F556ED789C3==========--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BA851D8D1FC943B3631B9406>