Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 20:45:26 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> Cc: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.pp.ru>, "Crist J . Clark" <cjc@FreeBSD.ORG>, net@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NOARP - gateway must answer and have frozen ARP table Message-ID: <20011205204526.B89520@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <200112051835.fB5IZqH95521@whizzo.transsys.com> References: <20011205124430.A83642@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <20011205040316.H40864@blossom.cjclark.org> <20011205231735.A1361@grosbein.pp.ru> <20011205193859.B79705@sunbay.com> <200112051835.fB5IZqH95521@whizzo.transsys.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:35:52PM -0500, Louis A. Mamakos wrote: > Doesn't this behavior need to be on a per-interface basis? I'm wondering > if a single sysctl is sufficient to get the desired effect. > No, we want ARP table to stay intact no matter which interface sends us an update. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011205204526.B89520>