Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 11:32:25 -0700 (MST) From: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com> To: Žoršur Ivarsson <totii@est.is> Cc: "hackers@FreeBSD.ORG" <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: weird IP address Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971214112821.2250O-100000@alive.znep.com> In-Reply-To: <349423A7.5669E713@est.is>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 14 Dec 1997, Žoršur Ivarsson wrote: > Are you telling me that I could register "what ever name" to "what ever > ip address" that even does not belong to me? I am saying you can use whatever IP you want for a nameserver when registering a domain via the InterNIC and they will not trying to figure out if you are authorized to use it. The InterNIC will list that nameserver in the DNS for that domain, will add a glue record for the nameserver, and will create a host record. You can't have multiple host records for one IP, though. > This does not seem to be logical. I can use "what ever name".est.is in > my domain for my network 194.144.208."what ever" but I must not be > allowed to register "what ever other name".est.is to address/network > that I have not got from INTERNIC/RIPE. Of course it is logical. How do you propose to magically detect if someone is using an address they shouldn't? You don't gain anything from doing it because you can't actually use that IP for anything. > We have virtual domains here and they have logical reason, but not > someone using reseved (assigned) address is not ethical. Ethics have nothing to do with it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.971214112821.2250O-100000>