Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 07:48:42 +0100 From: Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: graphics/rawtherapee: r342622 crashes on HEAD Message-ID: <52F3304A.2040900@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: <52F325AA.4060507@gwdg.de> References: <52F2952E.3090509@gwdg.de> <CD6B45AC-9AA0-410F-87E3-11CAB3A87733@FreeBSD.org> <52F29CE7.2050208@FreeBSD.org> <20140205212042.GP23872@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <52F325AA.4060507@gwdg.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 06.02.2014 07:03 (UTC+1) schrieb Rainer Hurling: > Am 05.02.2014 22:20 (UTC+1) schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: >> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 09:19:51PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: >>> Am 05.02.2014 21:08, schrieb Dimitry Andric: >>> >>>>> #17 0x00000000484c0ee0 in std::__1::locale::id::__next_id () from >>>>> /usr/local/lib/libc++.so.1 >>>> >>>> Hmm, is this a ports version of libc++? I was not aware Baptiste had >>>> already committed this? :) >>> >>> Yes, it is (as a build requisite, but apparently remained installed on >>> the destination machine), because we need to match the libraries that >>> the requisites use (Glibmm for one). >>> >>> I have given up on compiling RawTherapee with clang++ for now, and use >>> GCC 4.8 on all systems. RawTherapee is somewhat demanding, especially >>> at higher optimization level, and kills the 10.0-RELEASE base clang and >>> Port GCC 4.6 and 4.7, all with internal compiler errors. Since GCC 4.8 >>> worked for me, I did not bother to send Gerald the details. >>> >>> We may want to retry with clang if we've got the next clang version. >>> Feel free to use Rawtherapee as compiler system test ;) >>> >> >> try with something like this in libmap.conf >> libc++.so.1 /usr/local/lib/libc++.so.1 >> If that fixes the problem, then a rpath with /usr/local/lib should be set while >> building the port > > Hmm, I am not very familiar with libmapping. After adding it to > /etc/libmap.conf I get > > #rawtherapee > Shared object "/usr/local/lib/libc++.so.1" not found, required by > "rawtherapee" I just recognized, that in my CURRENT boxes in base their are two versions of libc++: #ll /usr/lib/libc++.so* -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel - 134 3 Aug 22:33:00 2013 /usr/lib/libc++.so -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel - 768248 4 Feb 18:08:00 2014 /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 Shouldn't libc++.so be a link to libc++.so.1 or at least also come from the newest built? > > Thanks for the tip, > Rainer > >> >> regards, >> Bapt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52F3304A.2040900>