Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 09:07:45 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, hrs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r400565 - head/security/pam_krb5 Message-ID: <56386B51.60301@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <201511030457.tA34vkf5040066@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <201511030457.tA34vkf5040066@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/3/2015 5:57 AM, Cy Schubert wrote:
> In message <56377C39.5000401@marino.st>, John Marino writes:
>> The bottom line is that a regression happened. If the current makefile
>> can't be fixed to operate as it was before, the change should be
>> reverted, right?
>
> Actually, it never worked in the first place. That is because the heimdal
> port puts its include files in ${LOCALBASE}/include/heimdal (take note of
> "heimdal" at the end of the path) and libraries in ${LOCALBASE}/lib/heimdal
> (same as above). Ldd ${LOCALBASE}/lib/security/pam_krb5.so makes that
> abundantly clear.
>
> Having said that, it's still no reason or excuse for it not to work. Tested
> in a virgin jail, it's working now, and committed. Sorry about the
> confusion.
I confirm it builds in poudriere now with the heimdal ports option set.
Thanks!
John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56386B51.60301>