Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 09:52:33 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, FreeBSD-current <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: CVS DIFF fix for review (-L added) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980111094456.11070A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <199801110348.LAA21317@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 11 Jan 1998, Peter Wemm wrote: > One of the patches you posted had the wrong number of arguments to > run_setup. You added two %s to the formats, but only added one extra > argument. As I see latest 'simplified' patch (which is CC'ed to info-cvs) do it correctly, just check. > Remember, this section of code is completely different in the current CVS, > as it calls an internal diff library rather than fork/exec/run-rcsdiff. > > peter@spinner[10:56am]~src-155> cvs --version > Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.9.23 (client/server) So why I contact info-cvs here according to your suggestion. Are they already fix diff problem in new version or similar workaround is needed? BTW, do you still against applying the fix into -current and -stable cvs (which 'cvs diff' remains broken)? -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nietzsche.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980111094456.11070A-100000>