Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 15:35:02 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 258846] devel/dyncall: Fix build on arm Message-ID: <bug-258846-7788-gP8UrNnpvW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-258846-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-258846-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D258846 --- Comment #16 from Tassilo Philipp <tphilipp@potion-studios.com> --- (In reply to Robert Clausecker from comment #15) Sorry if my message came across as I did attack you, which was not my intention. And the "if you insist" was more broadly aimed at the policy. Getting back to this, I unfortunately have a lot of stress at the moment af= ter a loss in the family, daily grind, etc. and thus little time at hand. Also, by grepping through the entire ports tree, I find thousands of exampl= es that do the same simple replacements as suggested here. I fully understand = that there is such policy, and that many of those examples might be historic. I'm not even against such a policy, at all, I just ask for reason. My plan was = to simply make my life easier, given that there won't be a freebsd specific patchset to maintain for some 3rd party software, as I am the maintainer and upstream. That said, I explained my case and I would appreciate if this will be accep= ted as-is, as it'll make my life easier now, and in a few months when I'll rele= ase 1.3 and update the port, which will remove those exact lines again. Please, @Mikael, let me know if you want me to convert this to patches after all. Thank you --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-258846-7788-gP8UrNnpvW>