Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:29:33 +0300 From: Iulian M <eti@erata.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: jamie@bishopston.net Subject: Re: linux-flashplugin dependency on linux-base ( was: flash7/firefox plugin no longer registers) Message-ID: <200610181729.36733.eti@erata.net> In-Reply-To: <200610181401.k9IE1fpY042603@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <200610181401.k9IE1fpY042603@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1389701.cqhLpaDycJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi On Wednesday 18 October 2006 17:01, Oliver Fromme wrote: > If you use linux-flashlugin with www/linuxpluginwrapper, > then you don't need the linux emulation at all (neither > linux-base nor the kernel module). > > However, if you use linux-flashplugin natively (with a > linux browser), then both are required. Yes, but the linux-flashplugin does NOT require linux-base, if you use it w= ith=20 a linux browser then the linux browser will require linux-base and the kern= el=20 module. So, keeping in mind that linux-base is no small port, i would sugge= st=20 removing the dependency on linux-base from linux-flashplugin .=20 Iulian M. http://www.erata.net =2D-=20 I like your game but we have to change the rules. --nextPart1389701.cqhLpaDycJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFNjpQE4semV9hLhcRAvy4AKC2hZKf3oJqjtIF3bzFKMOgRTVcCwCgx6px ujqLd3GH38uTKHFWYcgjUDE= =JK2z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1389701.cqhLpaDycJ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200610181729.36733.eti>