Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:17:37 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Dirk Meyer <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org> Cc: chukharev@mail.ru, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mk/bsd.openssl.mk optimization Message-ID: <488B15E1.1090802@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <y6ttUolvdV@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <08GlBzRclM@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> <op.ueqfl1xy0g54sc@localhost> <08GlBzRclM@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> <4889A1B8.9060900@FreeBSD.org> <y6ttUolvdV@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dirk Meyer wrote: > Kris Kennaway schrieb:, > >>> The result can be cached only if no other ports or package is installed. >>> So you are right that make index could be otimized, >>> but it will take much more work. >> Why can't you cache it in bsd.port.subdir.mk as I suggested? > > openssl does set NOPRECIOUSMAKEVARS=yes, > so that part ist skipped in bsd.port.subdir.mk. OK, but why is this necessary? Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?488B15E1.1090802>