Date: Sun, 1 Nov 98 10:45:54 PST From: "D. Alex Neilson" <neilson@www.nugate.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Alex Neilson <neilson@nugate.com> Subject: Static Route, need help (was: Re: Static Route (Correction)) Message-ID: <CMM.0.90.4.909945954.neilson@www.nugate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 30 Oct 1998 19:24:16 %2B0000
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> So, you can not do: > > route_bar="-host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff -interface epx" > > but you can ommit the ff's and do: > > route_bar="-host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -interface epx" I wish that one could, as it would solve my problem: With this configuration, to get A to talk to B, one could say on A route add -host 192.168.67.67 -interface vx0 ------- | | | A | | | ------- | 192.168.66.66 (vx0) | ------------------------------------- ethernet (multiple nets) | | | 192.168.67.67 (le0) ------- | | | B | | | ------- I get this route, but the gateway ethernet address is for host A: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif 192.168.67.67 0:60:8:4:4:ed UHLS 0 0 vx0 Of course, it doesn't work; strangely, if I try telnetting from B to A, it'll pause for a moment, then let me in, with A giving this message myhost /kernel: arp: 192.168.67.67 moved from \ 00:60:08:04:04:ed to 08:00:20:73:87:89 and A now shows the route I wanted in the first place: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif 192.168.67.67 8:0:20:73:87:89 UHLS 1 55 vx0 Is there a way to get the latter route in the first place? Thanks, Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CMM.0.90.4.909945954.neilson>