Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:27:26 -0400 From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What parts of UMA are part of the stable ABI? Message-ID: <CAFMmRNwrxdX9DdtAPRFhhrt3V=Uf6z-xqad4rri4e87-VzHaVQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <550AD6A3.1020406@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAFMmRNypU_Y9UKDwpiRtedOCeCPQFOsVuswN0-rn3EmVykTAYw@mail.gmail.com> <2085699.T9kJlc0rkf@ralph.baldwin.cx> <CAFMmRNyYng0dai73KW9P1G%2BwqG=fvbhNpT-dRd9MHTeAK7wZzA@mail.gmail.com> <3923303.nkjJO958qy@ralph.baldwin.cx> <CAJ-VmokQ9AjScMw0bYHZRW8C6nLJQPSp0aqfYBH0=CL1EOC5qQ@mail.gmail.com> <550A0B53.9020201@freebsd.org> <550AD6A3.1020406@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've put the full patch to convert uma_malloc and uma_free to accept a vm_size_t up for review[1]. It ended up being more extensive than expected as a fair number of places do use uma_set_allocf(). I do plan on MFC'ing this patch. This survive a make tinderbox (ignoring some vt-related LINT kernel build failures) I haven't attempted converting the uma ctors, etc over to vm_size_t yet, but I do plan on doing that still. [1] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2106
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFMmRNwrxdX9DdtAPRFhhrt3V=Uf6z-xqad4rri4e87-VzHaVQ>