Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 00:07:40 +0000 From: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> To: Edward Napierala <trasz@freebsd.org>, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com> Cc: FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 'td' vs sys/fs/nfsserver/ Message-ID: <YT1PR01MB354617E7933E349589D37A7BDD730@YT1PR01MB3546.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> In-Reply-To: <201903052008.x25K8d4Z011653@chez.mckusick.com> References: <CAFLM3-ouStEoEmXUmgJzaR5RoR954a4-RdK%2BNe6dzzqzsr50-A@mail.gmail.com>, <201903052008.x25K8d4Z011653@chez.mckusick.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kirk McKusick wrote: [interesting historical background snipped. And, yes, I do recall "u" being= at 56K.] >So, this is a long-winded way of saying that purging the passing >of td seems like a reasonable idea though one has to ask if the >cost in code churn is worth the effort. My main concern is that this will make MFC'ng more difficult, but I can liv= e with that. (I was hoping to avoid reviewing all these rather trivial edits, but it doe= sn't look like I can. I tried pointing out I wasn't the "maintainer", but I don't th= ink that got me "off the hook".;-) rick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YT1PR01MB354617E7933E349589D37A7BDD730>