Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 09 May 2002 15:01:14 -0700
From:      Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
To:        Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Perl scripts that need rewiting - Any volunteers? 
Message-ID:  <20020509220114.B513538CC@overcee.wemm.org>
In-Reply-To: <200205091608.g49G8qjV024230@grimreaper.grondar.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Murray wrote:
> > [bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To
    :]
> > 
> > On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 10:57:00AM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
> > > It would be acceptable to rewrite in C (C++?)
> > 
> > NO! for rewriting in C++.  If you do, you'll soon see the consequences.
> > (and that is all I am going to elude to at this time)
> 
> Need info here :-). Has this to do with GCC 3.x?

Yes.  The problem is libstdc++-v3.

> (And if so, are we in trouble with groff?)

Partly.  groff isn't a big libstdc++ user.  It is mostly a C-with-classes
and almost exclusively a libc user.

Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020509220114.B513538CC>