Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:13:10 +0200 From: Jakob Breivik Grimstveit <jakob@grimstveit.no> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Problems w/portsnap Message-ID: <20050930151310.7bc7c80f@corona.grimstveit.no>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Have two machines, both with 5.4p7 running on separate location, both with
portsnap-0.9.5, and both with the latest portsnap.conf.sample copied
to /usr/local/etc/portsnap.conf.
Just did a `portsnap fetch && portsnap update` on both boxes, so they should
contain exactly the same ports tree as far as I can see.
However, I experience large differences in the ports tree, where one of the
machines for examples lacks totally the
folder /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser, where the other machine has it.
How can this be? I find this when my SpamAssassin-upgrade failed miserably
not understanding where all the p5-ports had gone.
[jakobbg@nusse textproc]$ pwd
/usr/ports/textproc
[jakobbg@nusse textproc]$ ls|grep p5|wc -l
176
... where on the other machine ...
[jakobbg@hombre textproc]# pwd
/usr/ports/textproc
[jakobbg@hombre textproc]# ls|grep p5|wc -l
256
What silly have I done wrong here?
Thanks in advance.
--=20
Jakob Breivik Grimstveit, <http://www.grimstveit.no/jakob/>, 48298152
Bes=F8k Newsergalleriet: <http://www.newsergalleriet.no/>;
Never eat more than you can lift. -- Miss Piggy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050930151310.7bc7c80f>