Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:02:42 -0700 From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, Pascal Hofstee <caelian@gmail.com> Subject: Re: ZFS kernel panic Message-ID: <20070828170242.1559F5B30@mail.bitblocks.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:53:31 %2B0200." <20070828165331.GA39562@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> When you don't use redundant configuration (no mirror, no raidz, no > copies>1) then ZFS is going to panic on a write failure. It looks like > ZFS found a bad block on your disk. Does SUN really say this about ZFS? Is this acceptable in a production environment? What if one of your mirrored disk fails and in the "degraded" environment (before you have had a chance to replace the bad disk) ZFS discovers that a write fails? Why can't it find an alternative block to write to?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070828170242.1559F5B30>