Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 02:42:48 +0400 From: Dmitry Sarkisov <ait_mlist@rocc.ru> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Devin Teske <devin.teske@fisglobal.com>, 'Liste FreeBSD' <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Backup strategy for zfs + jail Message-ID: <20120117224248.GA61131@aperturescience.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201172331050.3938@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <885A2A83-A6FF-4E03-AB67-09BE0D2E557E@todoo.biz> <03a501ccd562$5b2f4e80$118deb80$@fisglobal.com> <20120117220551.GA8800@aperturescience.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201172331050.3938@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17-01-2012, Tue [23:31:30], Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > >Create snapshots of your datasets and use zfs send. You can even transfer > >differences between snapshots. > and then try to recover data from these backups after a year or so ;) No one did mention the retention policy ;) Jokes aside, we have a working solution with zfs/symantec netbackup combo based on incremental snapshots for a pretty large datasets. To OP: you don't have to use ftp with zfs send/recieve (I doubt it is possible at all :) ), ssh suits better. Just _google_ for it. There are plenty of solutions/examples in the Net. -- Best wishes, Dmitry Sarkisov <--\ <---+---------- <--/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120117224248.GA61131>