Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 26 Mar 2000 10:02:37 -0700 (MST)
From:      John Reynolds <jjreynold@home.com>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: anything more current info on UDF support/activities?
Message-ID:  <14558.17069.754126.394415@whale.home-net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003260829540.65123-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
References:  <14558.13857.889817.169398@whale.home-net> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003260829540.65123-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[ On Sunday, March 26, Julian Elischer wrote: ]
> I'm in the process of investigating UDF with the aim of
> producing a UDF filesystem (possibly only read-only)
> and a UDF enabled version of mkisofs (porst/sysutils)
> 

cool!

> I have all the appropriate specs and standards here and have been reading
> them. I also have the linux UDF code as of a month or two back. I'd love
> to see the MACOS-X UDF code but it doesn''t seem to be released in those
> parts they have made public.

:(

> The UDF filesystem is not rocket science but the documents describing it
> are in "ISO-Standardese" which means that they are almost IMPOSSIBLE to
> read. EVERYTHING is defined in the least useful manner possible, and no
> overall architecture is given. they just specify every single field, and
> you have to piece the big picture together from about 200 pages of minute
> fragments.

if it was easy to read, it couldn't be called a "standard" though ;-)

> (In the mean while all CDs and DVDs should also have a ISO9660
> filesystem in parallel, pointing at the same data) (for a couple of years
> anyhow) (that is what the standard for DVDs say)

Right ... I was originally searching for info on this topic because my wife got
a CD-R from her relatives that was supposed to have billions of scanned family
pictures on it. Unfortunately the person writing the CD-R used "DirectCD" from
adaptec which uses UDF and packet writing, rather than burning an ISO9660
filesystem the "traditional" way. Thus, I was not able to "see" the contents
under FreeBSD. It just got me curious.

Your code will not go un-appreciated!

Thanks for the more-up-to-date info,

-Jr

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
John Reynolds         Chandler Capabilities Engineering, CDS, Intel Corporation
jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com  My opinions are mine, not Intel's. Running
jjreynold@home.com          FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE. FreeBSD: The Power to Serve.
http://members.home.com/jjreynold/  Come join us!!! @ http://www.FreeBSD.org/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14558.17069.754126.394415>