Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:20:55 +0100 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: Robert M.Zigweid <rzigweid@zigweid.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[2]: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked Message-ID: <1059410703.20031116162055@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <B40D24A3-1843-11D8-ACF8-00039310484E@zigweid.net> References: <20031116051028.GA30485@roark.gnf.org> <B40D24A3-1843-11D8-ACF8-00039310484E@zigweid.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'll admit to being mostly a lurker here, but isn't the point of /sbin > to be statically linked. That's what the 's' stands for? > Second question. This seems to imply that /sbin and /bin both have to > have the same behavior? I have no problem with /bin being dynamically > linked, but what if I want /bin to be dynamic and /sbin static? man hier -- Best regards, Max mailto:max@love2party.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1059410703.20031116162055>