Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:33:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug <Doug@gorean.org> To: Harold Gutch <logix@foobar.franken.de> Cc: Ben Rosengart <ben@skunk.org>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909291632080.35014-100000@dt014n8c.san.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <19990930012053.A27137@foobar.franken.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Harold Gutch wrote:
> Uhm, that's the way I see it being _right now_ as well. What I
> was thinking of, was that things would go smoother if you
> wouldn't upgrade _right now_, but in [insert some time in the
> near future here], as things would perhaps be "fixed" by then.
There is no fix to make. If the binaries built by the current
sources cannot run unless the sigset_t stuff is in the kernel of the
machine that they are running on this problem will never be "fixed."
Doug
--
"Stop it, I'm gettin' misty."
- Mel Gibson as Porter, "Payback"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909291632080.35014-100000>