Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:14:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Marc van Woerkom <van.woerkom@netcologne.de> To: sos@freebsd.dk Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP development Message-ID: <200006231114.NAA05779@oranje.my.domain> In-Reply-To: <200006211934.VAA31186@freebsd.dk> (message from Soren Schmidt on Wed, 21 Jun 2000 21:34:51 %2B0200 (CEST)) References: <200006211934.VAA31186@freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Using a non opensource commercial version control system is just > to ask for bad carma, extended murphy fields and whatnot in an > opensource volounteer project... I would like to understand the discussed weakness of cvs regarding branches. Could someone explain it (in private) or point me to a link? I ask because I had to work a lot with MKS SI (RCS based) and it was OK to manage different branches with it. So I assumed cvs as a kind of successor to rcs is able to do this too. Or do people just like an improved architecture? I understand that systems like Perforce are handling diffs to the code base not file orientated but rather goal orientated which might give a much better overview. Regards, Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006231114.NAA05779>