Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 Jun 2013 00:15:43 +0200
From:      Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ted Faber <faber@lunabase.org>
Cc:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Another Firefox 21.0 crash (new backtrace)
Message-ID:  <F1105EC2-17E7-44F8-9488-FBC02DCF1CA1@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130602213125.GB87577@mail.lunabase.org>
References:  <20130525230731.GA93415@mail.lunabase.org> <51A49C40.1080209@FreeBSD.org> <20130528155234.GA17344@mail.lunabase.org> <20130529035333.GA2340@mail.lunabase.org> <6B3D745E-9ADD-4B2A-B2C0-53B920B9CC71@FreeBSD.org> <20130602213125.GB87577@mail.lunabase.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 2, 2013, at 23:31, Ted Faber <faber@lunabase.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 05:35:27PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> As a better fix, please try dropping the attached file into the
>> /usr/ports/www/firefox/files directory, then rebuild the firefox port
>> from scratch, and reinstall it.
> 
> That works as well - firefox runs with compat6x installed, but compliled
> with the patch to www/firefox .
> 
> Thanks again for debugging this!


Well, the mystery is not entirely solved, as Firefox does not crash with
a similar failure on -current, even with the compat6x libc.so.6
installed, and without the patch to osfile_unix_allthreads.jsm.

So *something* is different in the way multiple versions of libc.so are
handled, when they are loaded into the same process.  Kostik, maybe you
have any idea?

-Dimitry




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F1105EC2-17E7-44F8-9488-FBC02DCF1CA1>