Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Mar 2004 04:29:57 +0000
From:      Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
To:        James <haesu@towardex.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: My planned work on networking stack
Message-ID:  <20040302042957.GH3841@saboteur.dek.spc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040302031625.GA4061@scylla.towardex.com>
References:  <4043B6BA.B847F081@freebsd.org> <200403011507.52238.wes@softweyr.com> <20040302031625.GA4061@scylla.towardex.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:16:25PM -0500, James wrote:
> > >  [] move IPv4 routing to its own optimized routing table structure and
> 
> 	finally it's about time   :)

I've been fielding suggestions from individuals who feel using a multi-bit
trie might be more suitable for achieving higher PPS rates.

> > >     add multi-path and policy-routing options.  (planned)
> 
> 	would the policy-routing optioned table sort of similar to VRF's or
> 	different routing instances that could potentially be tied to userlands
> 	like Quagga?

That's the plan, I believe, anyway... It would be nice if Quagga could be
taught about how to add TCP-MD5 keys to both FreeBSD and OpenBSD SADBs.

BMS



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040302042957.GH3841>