Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:56:24 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Tristan <tris@infoeng.flinders.edu.au> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gvinum or vinum in 5.3-STABLE Message-ID: <20050214075624.GF39678@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20050214110826.56fa6cf3@rhino> References: <20050214110826.56fa6cf3@rhino>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:08:26AM +1030, Tristan wrote: > can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is > in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ? Is gvinum > ready for production use in a RAID5 config ? You need to use gvinum on 5-STABLE and -CURRENT. As far as I can tell, it would be wise to update to 5-STABLE or wait for 5.4 in order to use gvinum with RAID-5 configurations. There have been some important fixes to gvinum wrt RAID-5 on the -STABLE branch. Do _not_ use regular vinum on 5-STABLE, it will not work. --Stijn --=20 An Orb is for life, not just for Christmas. --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCEFmoY3r/tLQmfWcRAoVpAKCo975JeH6Xt9+/OB2UJHMqxE97MACgqojb tU0y7qJ4yD1E8P64iVOBKEA= =aOPr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050214075624.GF39678>