Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 6 Nov 2016 12:24:49 -0700
From:      Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>
To:        Derek Schrock <dereks@lifeofadishwasher.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, adamw@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: mail/{neo,}mutt: why not packaged with gpgme?
Message-ID:  <A0011F37-99FD-4C0B-8FBD-59D21082D861@adamw.org>
In-Reply-To: <20161106192007.GA71606@ircbsd.lifeofadishwasher.com>
References:  <20161102204551.jkismaljloqwlokp@box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu> <20161105111452.c76pnuvfloc56r54@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20161106192007.GA71606@ircbsd.lifeofadishwasher.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 6 Nov, 2016, at 12:20, Derek Schrock <dereks@lifeofadishwasher.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 07:14:52AM EDT, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 09:45:51PM +0100, Niklaas Baudet von =
Gersdorff wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>=20
>>> While talking about an issue I have with mail/{neo,}mutt and
>>> security/gnupg on #gnupg on freenode I was advised to use
>>> security/gpgme with mutt. I haven't been using gpgme for a while,
>>> mainly because the packaged versions of both mail/{neo,}mutt have
>>> it disabled and I was too lazy to compile it on my own. Since
>>> I got that advice, I've started wondering:
>>>=20
>>> Why is gpgme disabled by default?
>>>=20
>>> As was argued (and as I experienced myself) setting up mutt to
>>> work with gpgme is much easier than without. Especially gnupg2
>>> made it difficult to configure mutt without gpgme. So why not
>>> enabling gpgme in the packaged versions?
>>>=20
>>> I decided not to create a PR about this request. If that's wrong,
>>> tell me and I'll create one.
>>>=20
>>>    Niklaas
>>=20
>> Actually having tested it, yes you are right it is way more simple, I =
have
>> activated it in neomutt
>>=20
>> Best regards,
>> Bapt
>=20
> I can't find any reason why it was off in mail/mutt, maybe because it
> was always off since 2006.  However, since this appears to be a
> non-disruptive change, excluding some extra packages being installed, =
I
> think it should be turned on for mail/mutt as well.  Can this be =
updated
> without a PR/patch?

Done.

# Adam


--=20
Adam Weinberger
adamw@adamw.org
http://www.adamw.org





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A0011F37-99FD-4C0B-8FBD-59D21082D861>