Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 03:19:57 -0800 (PST) From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) To: jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org, peter@spinner.DIALix.COM Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/XFree86/patches patch-aa ports/x11/XFree86/scripts configure Message-ID: <199611111119.DAA09602@baloon.mimi.com> In-Reply-To: <9611102048.AA20410@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> (message from Jean-Marc Zucconi on Sun, 10 Nov 96 21:48:29 %2B0100)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Uh! I have a strange version then: * $ ls -l /usr/local/lib/libtk4* * -rwxr-xr-x 1 root bin 639012 May 16 04:37 /usr/local/lib/libtk4.1.a * lrwxr-xr-x 1 bin bin 15 Nov 6 00:34 /usr/local/lib/libtk4.1.so.1 -> libtk4.1.so.1.0 * -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 618221 Mar 29 1996 /usr/local/lib/libtk4.1.so.1.0 Actually, that's beta. It changed between beta and release. (See cvs log /usr/ports/x11/tk41/pkg/PLIST.) * I did a remake of tk and indeed it install itself as libtk41. But * there is another problem: the port does not build the static library * (libtk41.a) and XF86Setup needs to be linked static with libtk. * The tk port should be fixed so that both shared and static libs are * installed. Hmmm. I talked to David Dawes about ForceNormalLib and it's put back in in 3.2 config but tk doesn't use imake so it shouldn't matter. Peter, can you look at this? (You seem to understand this beast pretty well.... ;) Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611111119.DAA09602>