Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      30 Mar 2000 14:27:55 +0200
From:      Assar Westerlund <assar@stacken.kth.se>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: kernel building problems/room-for-improvement
Message-ID:  <5l4s9oiqwk.fsf@assaris.sics.se>
In-Reply-To: Adrian Chadd's message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2000 19:35:46 %2B0800"
References:  <5ln1nglp1c.fsf@assaris.sics.se> <20000330193545.D21291@ewok.creative.net.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:
> I agree that vnode_if.h needs to be in the sys/ tree for this, but I
> don't think it needs to be checked into CVS. It means any time
> someone modifies vnode_if.src a whole new vnode_if.h could possibly
> be generated, causing unnecessary repobloat.

Right, but that's the same as with syscall.h et al.

> How about having it built as part of populating /usr/include/sys/ ?

That would also work.

The reason why I didn't do it that way was because there didn't seem
to be any simple way of adding that generation of vnode_if.h into
src/include/Makefile.

/assar


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5l4s9oiqwk.fsf>