Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 04:05:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anatomy of Perfomance tests Message-ID: <1340967941011-5722964.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206291046510.43578@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <CAKdykDsWhygQz21R=wX8ou70Wd6GnV5SZ%2BNA8AFSDOY69-zikQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206291046510.43578@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At least he should have used one or at very least identical systems, not 3 different, albeit similar. And I do not care If it would change results or not, comparing different systems invalidates benchmarks period. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Anatomy-of-Perfomance-tests-tp5722932p5722964.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1340967941011-5722964.post>