Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:13:54 -0800 (PST)
From:      "Dorr H. Clark" <dclark@applmath.scu.edu>
To:        Igor Lepechin <gogi@themoscowtimes.com>
Cc:        freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Troubles with MP on ServerWorks NB6635 platform
Message-ID:  <Pine.GHP.4.21.0202071011360.25435-100000@hpux38.dc.engr.scu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <15152039138.20020204175259@themoscowtimes.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Igor Lepechin wrote:

> Feb  4 02:44:49 web /kernel: APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery
> Feb  4 02:44:49 web /kernel: APIC_IO: Broken MP table detected: 8254 is not connected to IOAPIC #0 intpin 2
> Feb  4 02:44:49 web /kernel: APIC_IO: routing 8254 via 8259 and IOAPIC #0 intpin 0
> --------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I've seen this on a prototype board also, 
which didn't involve the ServerWorks chips.
The system otherwise appeared to function
although the testing was not extensive.

Is it possible this is just an alarming tone
for an otherwise acceptable code path?

-dhc



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GHP.4.21.0202071011360.25435-100000>