Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:42:11 +0200
From:      Steve Clement <steve@ion.lu>
To:        ports@FreeBSD.org,  dinoex@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   FreeBSD Ports: webalizer/geolizer
Message-ID:  <42C57263.8020307@ion.lu>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigA9F63E786F5A66115862E678
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Is there any good reason having 2 different ports for these very similar
ports?

I have 1Patch to commit and that would mean twice the work. (Apart from
that the japanese addition from the "main" webalizer port aren't in
geolizer...)

WEBALIZER_GEOLIZER=yes make install

would't that be the solution?
also Geolizer is unmaintained and webalizer isn't.

Thanks,

Steve C

-- 
ION Network Solutions
Steve Clement
Unix System Administrator
209, rue des Romains
L-8041 Bertrange
Tel: +352 261 276-2
Fax: +352 261 276-9
mailto:steve@ion.lu
http://www.ion.lu


--------------enigA9F63E786F5A66115862E678
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCxXJoMH8DIBsiCrgRA+ooAJwMWr1c5XC0zAzXoOiHKfprRMcOggCdFSRh
loZ6SzOXnY+FeoIk/bLAxBM=
=Ccbn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigA9F63E786F5A66115862E678--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42C57263.8020307>